1. Identify what is keeping the purchase open
“Cash has not come back” can describe several different situations. Check the purchase, units, marketplace statement, and payout records together.
- Stock has not arrived: confirm delivery status, quantities, and any supplier follow-up.
- Units are still unsold: check the actual remaining stock and the evidence behind the selling plan.
- A sale happened but funds are unavailable: check payment status and the account’s payout details. A buyer paying does not always mean money is available for payout; eBay’s transaction-hold guidance describes that distinction.
- Money or inventory records are unresolved: investigate unmatched payouts, returns, cost corrections, or supplier money before relying on the result.
Several can be true at once. A purchase with unsold stock needs different follow-up from one whose only missing fact is a payout match. Use the payout reconciliation guide for matching and return checks.
Back to contents2. Complete the operating facts before a general plan review
For an open purchase, ResaleCraft’s attention workflow prioritizes these tasks before an overdue plan review:
- Confirm whether the purchase happened and how it was funded.
- Verify the actual total acquisition cost.
- Resolve inconsistent inventory quantities or costs.
- Review any pending customer return.
- Record arrivals or resolve units that will not arrive.
- Follow up supplier money that is still owed.
This identifies the next attention task. Recording a plan review does not replace those operating records or make their issues disappear. A closed purchase no longer needs an overdue plan review, although unconfirmed cost can still need follow-up.
For units still held, compare the item, condition, pack size, channel, and date of your current price evidence with the original assumptions. Keep a missing fact unknown while investigating it. ResaleCraft uses the information you enter; it does not inspect stock, research prices, or sync marketplace and bank accounts.
Back to contents3. Work through a six-unit purchase at day 38
This is an invented USD teaching record, not customer activity, live sale-price evidence, or an expected return. Assume confirmed nonborrowed cash funding, verified $600 total acquisition cost for six identical units, all six received, and no unresolved costs, returns, losses, or supplier reimbursements.
Two units have sold, with verified matched net payouts totaling $230. Here, that is cash received after the selling deductions included in those two payouts; the $600 acquisition cost is separate. Four units remain unsold. The original saved cash-return target is 30 days; the tracked purchase record is now 38 whole days old.
| Record | Calculation or value | What it means |
|---|---|---|
| Units still held | 6 − 2 = 4 | Physical units still to follow through |
| Net payouts received | $230 | Recorded cash returned from the two sales |
| Remaining inventory cost | $600 × 4 ÷ 6 = $400 | Cost allocated to the four remaining identical units |
| Time beyond the original target | 38 − 30 = 8 days | The recorded plan is overdue for review |
The $400 is remaining inventory cost. It is not cash available to spend, a current valuation, or a promise that future sales will return $400. The $230 payout total is not final profit for the whole purchase. Four units remain, so the purchase is still open.
In the app, age means elapsed whole days since the tracked position was created. It does not automatically identify how long the physical stock has been in storage, listed for sale, or held since supplier payment. Check the actual dates when those distinctions matter.
The overdue test uses the purchase’s own saved target: at 30 whole days against a 30-day target, its plan review is not yet due; at 31, it can be due if there is no future scheduled review and the earlier attention tasks are resolved. This example’s 30 days is not a universal definition of slow-moving or dead stock.
Back to contents4. Record what needs checking, with evidence
Open the purchase’s Review plan action. Choose the assessment that reflects what you know: Plan still works, Watch closely, or Action needed. Explain the facts behind it rather than choosing an assessment to clear the queue.
A useful review separates recorded facts, uncertain assumptions, and the next action. For the invented example, a Watch closely note could read:
Four units remain; two verified sales returned $230. The record is eight days beyond the original target. Check comparable sales and listing details before the next review; the selling-price evidence needs another check.
This note records a task, not proof that new market research has already happened. If an action is needed, name the concrete follow-up, such as replacing an unsupported price assumption with current evidence or reviewing listing details manually. The app requires a note for Action needed.
A review does not decide a markdown or exit for you. Any listing or selling decision still needs your own evidence and action in the relevant channel.
Back to contents5. Choose a next check without moving the original target
The review form offers 3, 7, 14, or 30 days until the next review. Pick the interval that fits the follow-up you have written. In this example, choose seven days to return to the evidence and listing checks.
While that next-review time is in the future, the plan review is scheduled. Once the saved time is reached, revisit or refresh the page to see the due state using a fresh view. Do not rely on an email, push notification, or a page left open updating itself as your reminder.
With no intervening changes, the seven-day check would find the tracked record at day 45: 45 − 30 = 15 days beyond the original target. Scheduling the next review did not change that target to 45 days. It added a dated follow-up.
If a delivery, return, cost, or supplier-money issue arises first, the attention workflow can surface that task even while the plan review is scheduled. At the next check, record the new facts and assessment rather than treating the earlier note as a finished result.
Back to contents6. Preserve the original plan and distinguish later actions
The saved forecast explains what you expected when deciding to buy. A later purchase-plan review adds your current assessment and next-review date; it does not rewrite that forecast, change the original target, record a sale, or close the purchase.
Keep operating changes in their own records. A review note is not a payout match, a received unit, a settled supplier reimbursement, or a price change. When money or stock changes, update the appropriate purchase or payout workflow and retain the history.
ResaleCraft’s capital-return grouping uses remaining planned or confirmed inventory cost against target dates. An overdue amount there describes cost attached to the outstanding record. Scheduling a later review does not move it into a later cash-return week or establish when proceeds will arrive.
Use the cash-flow versus profit guide when deciding what money is actually available for another purchase. Use the maximum-buy-price example for a new opportunity’s economics; it does not decide what to do with older stock.
Back to contentsKeep the review record short and specific
- Original plan: tracked purchase, saved target, record age, and relevant actual dates.
- Current facts: units received, sold, and still held; confirmed cost; matched cash received; unresolved money or stock obligations.
- Delayed stage: delivery, sale, payout availability, reconciliation, or more than one.
- Assessment and evidence: what remains supported, what is uncertain, and what changed.
- Next action and check: the exact follow-up and selected review interval.
When the follow-up is complete, record what actually changed. A useful history can explain why the plan was retained or reconsidered without making an earlier forecast look more certain than it was.
Back to contentsSources and scope
Primary references checked October 30, 2026: business.gov.au: Guide to managing cash flow, for regular inventory checks and identifying stock that is not selling; eBay: Transaction holds, for the distinction between buyer payment and available funds; and eBay: Product research, for checking comparable item and condition evidence.
The dates, amounts, targets, and review note above are invented. No live comparable sales were fetched. The current invitation-only ResaleCraft pilot supports manual entry and CSV workflows in USD; its review records do not provide automatic markdowns, marketplace actions, sale predictions, or background notifications.
Back to contents